31
Oct
09

Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 Released

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Uncategorized

The Firefox Beta was just released for version 3.6. Lots of improvements, most notably:

From Mozilla

  • Users can now change their browser’s appearance with a single click, with built in support for Personas.
  • Firefox 3.6 will alert users about out of date plugins to keep them safe.
  • Open, native video can now be displayed full screen, and supports poster frames.
  • Support for the WOFF font format.
  • Improved JavaScript performance, overall browser responsiveness and startup time.
  • Support for new CSS, DOM and HTML5 web technologies.

Personal Notes

  • Mac version now has smooth scrolling.
  • Simpler pages (text and images) seem to load faster than Safari 4. No benchmarks to back this up yet.
  • Application seems more responsive overall.
  • Still notably absent is native cocoa and keychain support.
  • Faster start up, even from a cold start.

Remember, this release will break compatibility with most extensions. Fortunately, you can get around this by doing the following:

  1. Go to the address bar and type about:config
  2. Click “I’ll be careful, I promise!”
  3. Right click anywhere, highlight New, and select Boolean
  4. Make its name extensions.checkCompatibility, and make the value False.
  5. Restart Firefox and give those extensions a shot.

This method doesn’t fix every extension (some are unfortunately just not compatible), but it does allow some of the big ones like Adblock Plus and Greasemonkey to work.

So far, this version seems much improved from 3.5, and I may actually start using it full time on OS X. If you like living on the edge, hit the link and give it a shot.

Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 Download

27
Oct
09

Weekly Rant: On Net Neutrality

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Weekly Rant

Time to take a second and rant about net neutrality. You’ll find net neutrality discussions raging on just about any tech or internet related forum this week, with even the mainstream media getting their hands in the pot. Some claim that legislating net neutrality will stifle innovation and lead to the demise of free market capitalism, and others claiming that not legislating net neutrality will likely mean the downfall of the American section of the internet.

Net neutrality, in a nutshell, is the idea that the internet service providers, such as Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon should not give special treatment to the data flowing through their networks. For the most part, its the way the internet works right now. On a non-neutral network, the ISPs could give more priority to traffic of their choice, or degrade the speed of traffic of their choice. Comcast, for example, might degrade traffic from Hulu so that customers would be deterred from using it and instead use their service, or it could give special treatment to traffic from their own streaming offerings.

As you can see, there is a clear conflict of interest in some cases. John McCain sponsored a bill this past week, ironically dubbed the Internet Freedom Act, which would bar the FCC or other government bodies from regulating the internet or ISPs. That’s the same John McCain that doesn’t know how to check his email, in case you were wondering. Right wingers have pushed the idea that we should let the free market take care of itself, that the government only wants net neutrality to get its hands further around the internet, net neutrality would be the new fairness doctrine, and it would put a stranglehold on the ISPs and innovation.

In the words of Penn and Teller, bullshit.

The clear thing to understand in the debate about net neutrality is that the net is already neutral. The FCC is at this time only seeking to make it official, and bar ISPs from changing this. In a non neutral environment, the ISPs ultimately would control the internet. The would have the power to slow down traffic from less popular sites, or sites that don’t pay a special fee, while big players like Google and Amazon would likely have to pay to get their traffic through quickly.

There are a few other clear conflicts of interest here. In the case of Comcast, who is positioning themselves to buy NBC Universal, what happens to the traffic from, say, CBS? How about Verizon and AT&T. Do they let Skype and other VOIP services through unmolested?

Some of you may be listening to the rhetoric coming from the side of the ISPs, saying they should have the right to prioritize traffic from hospitals and the health care institution because it could be very time sensitive. That all this talk about extra payment is speculation and that the ISPs would use this power for good.

I’d point to a couple of things. First, Comcast has already shown how it “manages it’s network” with the bittorrent fiasco last year. Comcast decided to throttle bittorrent to near unusable speeds when they determined its a popular method for sharing files. The problem, of course, is that bittorrent is not solely used to abuse copyright. A stop was put to this by the FCC last year as well.

AT&T and Verizon have shown via their text messaging costs that they have no problem charging extra just for changing where the traffic is coming from. Even though they both support unlimited data plans (which actually has limits, but we’ll save that for later), they charge exorbitant  rates for text messaging, even though it’s just data. In fact, for those of you doing the math, it might cost as much as a thousand per gigabyte.

The problem of net neutrality is exacerbated by the lack of choice in providers in the US. I have exactly two choices for providers where I am – Comcast Cable and Qwest DSL. The DSL service is generally slower, while a little cheaper. But both Comcast and Qwest are pushing for the Internet Freedom Act. My choice seems to be between bad and worse.

So why would McCain sponsor a bill that seems so anti-consumer? I’ll just leave this here, and let you decide for yourself. It seems to me that on one side, we have ISPs, Telcos, lobbyists and the politicians, and on the other we have everyone else.

Jon Stewart had some thoughts about net neutrality, which I will leave you with.

 

The weekly rant is a space for me to yammer on about all those frustrating things I find on the internet, with technology, and life in general. Watch out for heated discussion and NSFW language.

21
Oct
09

Barnes and Noble to Take on the Kindle

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Uncategorized
Courtesy of Gizmodo/Wired

Courtesy of Gizmodo/Wired

Barnes and Noble have just announced their own ebook reader, The Nook. The Nook is reported to run Android, and has both a small color touchscreen in addition to using a 6inch e-ink display. The touch screen will be for navigating the device, as well as the internet. Other notable features are the 2 GB of storage, Wifi, 3G, and a MP3 capability. The device is reported to support both epub and PDF.

Perhaps the most interesting thing to note about this device is the ad set to run in the New York Times which says “Lend ebooks to friends.” Aside from the lack of a public library for ebooks, the other big problem is reselling ebooks and lending to friends. Allowing for the ability to lend ebooks or resell them make this an interesting looking device.

20
Oct
09

Apple Releases New Hardware, Still Can’t Stop Reinventing the Whe… Errr, Mouse

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Apple

The Apple Store is back up, and with it new hardware. Specifically beefed up Mini’s (now available with Snow Leopard Server), new iMacs with bigger, better displays, redesigned plastic Macbooks, and The Magic Mouse. The new hardware looks pretty great, with the exception of the Magic Mouse.

Here’s the thing Apple. The mouse has already been done, and it’s been done pretty well. I get it, you don’t like buttons. But sometimes, you need buttons. The new mouse looks like a step back in terms of usability, and only furthers the hilarity that connected to nice, expensive Macs you don’t often find Apple Mice, you find $15 Microsoft Mice. More proof of the Onion’s prescience. NSFW.

Apple mice designers: Bluetooth, laser, 2 buttons and a tilt wheel. It’s not that hard.

20
Oct
09

Why Android Won’t be Usurping the iPhone Any Time Soon

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Uncategorized

This week brings a new competitor to the smart phone market – Droid, from Motorola. Little is known about Droid thus far, except that it will feature Android 2.0, a physical keyboard, touch screen, a 5.0 megapixel digital camera with autofocus, and that it seems to position itself directly against the iPhone.

Motorola has released an ad targeted pretty much directly at the iPhone, and is using the rather daring tagline “iDon’t [blank] … Everything iDon’t, droid does.” The ad in question. The ad takes shots at the iPhone’s lack of a physical keyboard, notoriously bad App Store approval process, shoddy home screen, and a few others. But it severely misses something – the apps.

iPhone unquestionably has the largest mobile app store market. Now that many phones are catching up to the iPhone in overall usability, the big differentiator seems to be what you can actually do with the phone itself. And, of course, what you can do with the phone is largely dependent on the apps available for the platform. Right now, the iPhone handily beats the rest of the market with regards to what’s available for it.

Indeed, this is a bit counter intuitive. Blackberry, for example, still has more of the mobile market than the iPhone, an open development environment allowing you to install pretty much whatever you’d like, and has been around quite a while longer than the iPhone. But Apple’s store still trounces the catalog of apps available for Blackberry.

While people erupt over the iPhone’s seemingly arbitrary app store approval process, which has lead to denied applications and developers wondering if their app will ever be approved, the store still continues to grow, attracting new developers each day.

Apple has done something pretty amazing in regards to the iPhone. They’ve made a powerful platform, capable of doing 3d games reminiscent of the quality you’d get out of the original Playstation, and given customers an easy way to discover new content. Customers don’t have to check system specs before downloading, because 95% of the material available in the app store will work across all phones. The only small fracture being the new capabilities in the iPhone 3GS. Developers can code with confidence that their app will run on every iPhone on the market. Ironic, considering what a blistering failure the same sort of ideas would be on the desktop computer market.

And now let’s get back to Android. A very capable, open source mobile platform with the ability to run on just about anything. Very open development, allowing developers to harness just about every level of the hardware and OS itself. And it’s not going to take off, at least not in the way the iPhone has.

It’s biggest weakness is it’s biggest strength. Android can run on anything. Great for those that want total control and choice in their mobile device. Great for the developer, but also completely terrible. When writing the app, do you optimize for a touchscreen? Trackball? Physical keyboard? Onscreen keyboard? What CPU is it going to run? How much memory will it have?

This isn’t to say that Android won’t live on, but I think what you are going to see is more fragmented implementations like Android’s desktop cousin, Linux. We’ve already begun to see some of this with HTC’s Sense, and now Motorola’s Blur. Desktop Linux, however, does face one less challenge than Android, however. A developer writing an app for a desktop Linux can reasonably assume that the user has a keyboard and mouse.

As the iPhone has shown us, what works on the desktop doesn’t necessarily work on mobile devices. Actually, I guess I should say what Windows Mobile has shown us, given that it is the closest to a desktop experience, and arguably one of the worst mobile operating systems, but I digress. The majority of users are going to simply want to know that it works. Android does sort of confuse the issue a bit, and will likely introduce a new question to mobile customers: will this app work with my handset?

I hope I am wrong, and that the Droid, and the Android platform, is a runaway success. We’ve been shown over and over that competition is good for the customer, and iPhone owners will most certainly gain from a strong Android platform. I just hope that the biggest competition Android faces is not Android itself.

19
Oct
09

Windows 7 Parties – Definitely lame, but successful?

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Operating Systems
Tags: , ,

While watching This Week in Tech today, I couldn’t help but notice Leo and the gang talking again about the Windows 7 launch parties. As you’ve probably already heard, Microsoft is sponsoring house parties for selected volunteers. There was a video released from Microsoft which suggested different things you could do at your Windows party – and it was terrible. The whole thing was awkward, and seemed a bit too much like an instruction video your mom might give you for your first party.

So of course, no one signed up and this is a total marketing flop. Except it isn’t. Actually, Microsoft had to cut off some volunteers and it would seem that everyone is talking about it. As I said, I’ve heard more stuff about it on TWiT this week, as well as some of Leo’s other shows. Buzz Out Loud has covered this a few times as well, and basically the entire tech blog sector has done at least one story on it.

Microsoft is no stranger to awkward and confusing marketing. Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld left people scratching their heads wondering what Seinfeld, or that ad campaign for that matter, had to do with windows, or even Microsoft. Another recent commercial suggests that Windows 7 is the choice of 7 year olds everywhere in a gag reflex inducing attempt to be cute and point out Windows 7’s simplicity.

And as I recalled these events I realized something. Microsoft is an advertising troll. Apple takes the hipster route and gets people talking about their commercials by taking shots at windows and being a little smarmy. HP or Dell are generally very conservative, and seem to take a rather traditional approach to advertising.

And then there is Microsoft. One of the richest tech companies in world, whose name is nearly synonymous with desktop computing, releasing these poor ads. On the surface, they are horrid. But when was the last time the tech news industry covered a bland Intel ad for two weeks? Free publicity. If you read any kind of tech news or listen to tech podcasts, you’d be hard pressed not to know that Windows 7 is soon to be released.

They are either doing this on purpose, or Microsoft desperately needs to fire their ad department.

16
Oct
09

Why Are You Still Using MobileMe?

By Charles 2 Comments
Categories: Mobile and Mobile Devices
Serious question. I bought a MobileMe subscription just after it launched. It had a few problems, but I bought it for a few reasons, chiefly because I was using multiple machines and wanted access to my contacts and calendars without transferring or syncing, or any of the other garbage that comes along with it. MobileMe worked beautifully for this. As a bonus for me, I also got some storage in the cloud, and photo sharing. But it just is no longer worth money, and I’ll tell you why – you can get just about all of it for free.
Push Email, Contacts, and Calendars
With the introduction of the iPhone 2.0 software release, Microsoft Exchange support finally came to the iPhone. No, I am not going to suggest you roll your own exchange server, because someone else has already done that for you – Google. For the last few months, I have been syncing my calendars and contacts over the air with Google, and it has worked for me just as well as MobileMe. The only hold back was that there was no push email for the iPhone. That’s changed now, too. Using Google services, you can easily replicate the push features of MobileMe. Another thing to note: With iPhone 3.0, push notifications were introduced. Apps like PushMail can send you a push notification as soon as an email arrives from any email address.
Setup Push features on the iPhone
Setup syncing with Outlook
Setup syncing with iCal and Address Book.
Cloud storage
A MobileMe subscription also comes with a 10GB iDisk. The iDisk feature seems to work best on Mac OS X, but it is also accessible via the web based interface. My suggestion for this is to use Dropbox. I considered keeping the MobileMe subscription because of the rather excellent iPhone app, which allows you to view and access your iDisk and its files. But then Dropbox went ahead and caught up and released their own app. The Dropbox app for the iPhone works pretty well, although not quite as well as the iDisk app, but the desktop features pretty much blow the iDisk out of the water. The small caveat here is that the free Dropbox is only 2GB. However, I really only store two types of files in the cloud: documents and pictures. My documents can easily fit inside the 2GB, and we’ll talk about pictures in just a second.
Pictures
MobileMe also sports a reasonably featured picture gallery and sharing platform, while using the 10GB of storage from your iDisk. There are a lot of choices that replicate this feature, but I’ve gone with Flickr. Flickr easily outperforms MobileMe for picture storage and sharing, and is free. Since most of my storage space on MobileMe was taken up by pictures, moving them to Flickr freed up enough space for Dropbox’s 2GB capacity to be perfectly adequate. Again, another small caveat – Flickr has an upload limit per month. A $25 annual subscription will negate this, and let you upload to your heart’s content.
In summary
A lot of people argued that MobileMe wasn’t worth it, even at launch. I disagreed, and enjoyed the features that I couldn’t easily get otherwise. Now though, I just can’t really justify the $99 when I can get 95% of the way there for free. For $25 you can get around Flickr’s upload limit, and for $50 you can get 50GB on Dropbox. So if you must spend some money, $75 gets you more than you get with MobileMe. The only compelling feature that MobileMe has that isn’t replicated by free features is Find My iPhone. I’ll admit, this is a pretty awesome feature, and for a lot of you, this feature might justify the cost. It just doesn’t for me.

Serious question. I bought a MobileMe subscription just after it launched. It had a few problems, but I bought it for a few reasons, chiefly because I was using multiple machines and wanted access to my contacts and calendars without transferring or syncing, or any of the other garbage that comes along with it. MobileMe worked beautifully for this. As a bonus for me, I also got some storage in the cloud, and photo sharing. But it just is no longer worth money, and I’ll tell you why – you can get just about all of it for free.

Push Email, Contacts, and Calendars

With the introduction of the iPhone 2.0 software release, Microsoft Exchange support finally came to the iPhone. No, I am not going to suggest you roll your own exchange server, because someone else has already done that for you – Google. For the last few months, I have been syncing my calendars and contacts over the air with Google, and it has worked for me just as well as MobileMe. The only hold back was that there was no push email for the iPhone. That’s changed now, too. Using Google services, you can easily replicate the push features of MobileMe. Another thing to note: With iPhone 3.0, push notifications were introduced. Apps like PushMail [iTunes link] can send you a push notification as soon as an email arrives from any email address.

Setup Push features on the iPhone

Setup syncing with Outlook

Setup syncing with iCal and Address Book.

Cloud storage

A MobileMe subscription also comes with a 10GB iDisk. The iDisk feature seems to work best on Mac OS X, but it is also accessible via the web based interface. My suggestion for this is to use Dropbox. I considered keeping the MobileMe subscription because of the rather excellent iPhone app, which allows you to view and access your iDisk and its files. But then Dropbox caught up and released their own app. The Dropbox app for the iPhone works pretty well, although not quite as well as the iDisk app, but the desktop features pretty much blow the iDisk out of the water. The small caveat here is that the free Dropbox is only 2GB. However, I really only store two types of files in the cloud: documents and pictures. My documents can easily fit inside the 2GB, and we’ll talk about pictures in just a second.

Pictures

MobileMe also sports a reasonably featured picture gallery and sharing platform, while using the 10GB of storage from your iDisk. There are a lot of choices that replicate this feature, but I’ve gone with Flickr. Flickr easily outperforms MobileMe for picture storage and sharing, and is free. Since most of my storage space on MobileMe was taken up by pictures, moving them to Flickr freed up enough space for Dropbox’s 2GB capacity to be perfectly adequate. Again, another small caveat – Flickr has an upload limit per month. A $25 annual subscription will negate this, and let you upload to your heart’s content.

In summary

A lot of people argued that MobileMe wasn’t worth it, even at launch. I disagreed, and enjoyed the features that I couldn’t easily get otherwise. Now though, I just can’t really justify the $99 when I can get 95% of the way there for free. The only compelling feature that MobileMe has that isn’t replicated by free features is Find My iPhone. I’ll admit, this is a pretty awesome feature, and for a lot of you, this feature might justify the cost. It just doesn’t for me.

Edit:

As Chris points out below. I overlooked Back to my Mac. Back to my Mac allows you to connect to your Macs remotely, while not necessarily on the same network. If you are using a Macbook out on the road and remember that file you need back on your iMac, Back to my Mac might come in handy. Back to my Mac is something that you might consider keeping MobileMe for, because while you can set up screen sharing and file sharing without BTMM, it certainly makes it a lot simpler. While the other things on the list above are easily replicated for free, replicating BTMM for free takes more time and know-how, since you will have to set up multiple services on the computers you want to connect to and from, edit router configs, and so on. In short, BTMM is a ‘pro’ for MobileMe, and if you use this service, or are interested, it might swing MobileMe back into the “worth it” column.

21
Jul
09

Google Voice – One Number to Rule Them All

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Mobile

Google Voice is currently a beta service offered by the big G to help mitigate some annoyances with phones. Ever get stuck listening to a voicemail that’s five minutes long and essentially just says “call me back”? Or pick up a call at the office, only to realize that the call is going to keep you anchored to your desk for the next 20 minutes? Does your business card have a half dozen numbers to reach you at? Google voice might be for you.

In a nutshell, Google Voice is a currently invite only, free service that allows you to have one number for all your phones, and rings all of your phones when someone calls that number, allowing you to choose which phone you answer. But it doesn’t stop there. You can also transfer calls between phones, screen calls, and get voicemails transcribed and emailed to you along with an audio recording. A bunch more as well, which will be covered below.

First thing is first, go grab an invite. It’s free, so if this sounds interesting at all to you, drop off your email. When you do get invited, you’ll get to choose a number that will become the one number you give to everyone. You can select a number in your area code, zip code, or wherever you’d like. You can also search for text, so you could try to grab 555-5CALLME if you chose to.

Picture 3

Your Inbox. Works like gMail (even with keyboard shortcuts!). SMS and voicemail will show up here.

Setting up the Service

From there, you can set up all of your phones. The process is painless, and pretty customizable. Once you set up your phones, you can choose which phones will ring when you get a call, and which phones will receive SMS. You can set up schedules as well, just in case you don’t want to get calls on your mobile between 9PM and 7AM, or your home phone during office hours, or whatever arbitrary schedule you’d like.

Next, set up your voicemail. The cool thing here is that you can set up multiple greetings for your contacts. When the kids call, they can get “Daddy’s busy, but I’ll call you back soon, sweetie.” while the office gets “I’m not in the office. If this isn’t an emergency, your call will be returned during business hours.” You can set up quite a few of these, which is kind of nice.

Groups and their settings.

Groups and their settings.

You’ll also want to set up your Google Contacts if you aren’t already using this service. I just set up Google Contact Sync (which is built into Address Book on Leopard) using this handy tutorial. A quick search revealed that there are plenty of other ways to get your contacts to Google, and if nothing else most PIM’s support exporting via comma separated values (.CSV) so you should be able to get all your important numbers into Google without too much trouble. When you set up your contacts, make sure that you use the “Groups” feature, as this is how gVoice decides which voicemail greeting to give, and whether or not the call is going to get screened (depending on how you chose in “Settings”).

Another tip I found is that you want to change any voicemail boxes or answering machines to answer only after 20 rings (or some other long number) so that your old answerer doesn’t pick up your call before Google does.

Phone Settings.

Phone Settings.

Using the Service

Once you’ve got all of the basics set up, start giving everyone your Google number. I did this with a mass email and a giant SMS. I imagine that I’ll probably get a few stragglers later on, but this took care of most people. Now, when someone calls or SMS’s, Google will send the call/SMS for whichever phones you set up. Another bonus: As long as you use Voice, you’ll never need another number. You can easily change and add phones at your whim.

When you answer a call through Voice, you’ll be presented with options: 1. Accept the call. 2. Send to voicemail. 3. Send to voicemail and listen in. 4. Record the call. This can be kind of annoying. I use an iPhone, so for contacts that I don’t screen ever (like family) I turned this option off. You can also have people that aren’t in your contacts list record their name, which gets played back to you before you choose what to do with the call.

If a voicemail or SMS is sent to your Voice number, it shows up in your online inbox. You can reply to SMS, listen to your voicemail, or view the transcription online. You can also have Voice send you SMS or email of the transcriptions.

I’m sure you’re wondering how well transcription works, and the answer is about 50/50. It’s pretty decent for getting the gist of the message, but not too great altogether. If you have someone that mumbles a bit, you’ll probably still need to listen to the voicemail.

Calling out, as well as SMS can be a bit tricky. When you call out, you want your Google number to appear in the voicemail. On a landline or dumb phone, you have to call your Voice number, then enter the number of your contacts. You can also call from the web interface. This will cause Voice to ring your phones, and when you answer it will connect connect you to the contact you selected.

On a smartphone, it gets a bit easier, particularly on Android and Blackberry, which Google has built apps for. On iPhone, there isn’t an app quite yet, so you have a choice between VoiceCentral or GVMobile. This makes it easier to get calls to people with your voice number. There’s another small trick, and that’s to use the 406 number you get from Google with an SMS.

When someone sends you an SMS, it doesn’t come from their number, it comes from a 406 number. This number is unique to you, but it allows you to reply and have your Google number show. You can also use this number to make calls to them with your Google number as well. I’ve simply been programming this as a secondary number with the tag “GVoice” and then using it instead of their regular number. There’s a lot more interesting stuff going on with this 406 number, but that’s a different article.

All in all, making calls is a bit kludgy without that 406 number, which you don’t get without receiving an SMS from the person you want to call, and is different depending on which phone you are calling from. You can use the web interface, but that’s not quite as easy as just hitting the speed dial on your phone. Hopefully with the release of more official apps for mobile devices this will improve.

Verdict

A little inconvenient to set up, but once you get it rolling it’s immensely useful. I rarely have to listen to voicemails now (which I love) and the ability to have one single number to give out is almost enough a reason to switch on its own. When Google gets around to releasing an official iPhone app, I am sure I’ll be happeir with it. In any case, I’m no longer giving out anything but my Google number.

10
Jul
09

Amazon Considers Putting Ads in the Kindle

By Charles Leave a Comment
Categories: Mobile Devices
Tags: , ,

kindle_ads cnet News is reporting that Amazon is filing patents for advertising in the Kindle. The patents vary a bit from inserting ads into free or discounted books (with the purchase of the physical book” to inserting ads in books themselves.

The patents outline the possibility of having ads inserted every few pages to inserting ads in the margins of the book. As someone who enjoys reading and is considering a Kindle, I find this a bit discouraging.

I enjoy getting lost in a book. I like to immerse myself in a book deeply enough that I forget how much time has passed as I am reading. Books serve as one of the last few refuges from the incessant advertising that proliferate throughout every other form of media. If they simply insert ads into books, I won’t buy a Kindle.But it could get interesting.

Perhaps the biggest complaint about the Kindle is the price tag. Most people seem to love the device, but at $299, it’s a difficult expense to justify if you don’t have a lot of cash laying around. Rumors have been floating around that newspaper companies may decide to subsidize the device in exchange for a commitment to subscribe for a predetermined time, similar to the way mobile phones are subsidized now in exchange for a service contract. An ad supported model could change the game significantly, and get a Kindle in a lot more hands.

Ads might allow them to get very competitive with pricing for both the device and the actual content. A Kindle priced at $99 would be a no brainer for those of us that read a lot. Even at $299, if you could get an entire book for $3, it might be worth it.

As things stand though, I am not ready for advertising to seep into any other avenue in my life. Its difficult enough to avoid it now. In books? No thanks.

09
Jul
09

Google Chrome OS – Impacts and Expectations

By Charles 3 Comments
Categories: Mobile and Operating Systems
Tags: , , , , , ,

Google-Chrome-Browser-LogoUnless you’ve been under a rock for the last few days, you’ve likely heard that Google is set to release an OS which will be based around similar philosophies as the Chrome browser. So what does that mean?

Well, Google gives some vague ideas of what it might be. It’ll focus on “speed, simplicity, and security” and also says that “most of the user experience will happen on the web.” They say they’ll be building a lightweight window manager on top of the Linux kernel, and that it should get users to the web quickly.

In all likelihood, Chome OS will focus on existing Google products – Gmail, Docs, Calendar, etc. This brings about a few big questions.

1. What’s the point?

No, seriously. Why bother? Since you can access all of these products using any existing standards based browser, why do you need an OS based around a browser? On a netbook, this sounds like it might be great. Since netbooks are typically pretty underpowered, a suite of solid web apps, quick startup and shutdown, and simplicity are certainly nice. Hosting files online like you would with Google Docs would certainly help keep those tiny SSD’s free as well. They also mention that it will work with x86 based chips as well. Which begs the question:

2. Why would you wipe a full OS like Ubuntu, Windows 7, or OS X in favor of Google Chrome?

I love speed and simplicity as much as anyone, but sometimes not at the expense of utility. How many of you would be using Chrome as your browser if not for all those awesome extensions you have in Firefox? With Firefox 3.5, you get almost all of the speed of Chrome, plus a thousand times more utility. The very same can be said about Chrome OS and the other competing OS’s. On a netbook, you might want the simplicity of Chrome OS, but what about on a full size laptop or desktop?

3. How about privacy?

If, as is being speculated, most of your data lives in the cloud (on Google’s servers), how is that going to affect privacy? I mean, Google already does a fair amount of crawling my email, will they be doing the same with personal files? What happens if a court subpoenas my information? Will Google give it to them?

In any case, I hope that Google has some success in the OS market.  More competition will breed innovation from other OS makers. I think Windows 7 is shaping up to be pretty good, but I sincerely doubt it would have been what it is now if not for Apple gaining market share with OS X, and options like Ubuntu becoming a more viable alternative every day.

I also have pretty high hopes for Chrome OS considering how many other Google products I use regularly and love. I’d argue that GMail change the way a lot of people think about email, and I hope they do the same with Operating Systems.

« Previous Entries

Twitter