<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Charles E Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlesesmith.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlesesmith.net</link>
	<description>My thoughts on tech and other geekery.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Parties &#8211; Definitely lame, but successful? by techwoo</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/10/19/windows-7-parties-definitely-lame-but-successful/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>techwoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Nice blog. I added to my twitter. Your topic Windows 7 Parties - Definitely lame, but successful? very good. i post it to my forum http://bit.ly/4Tnwzn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog. I added to my twitter. Your topic Windows 7 Parties &#8211; Definitely lame, but successful? very good. i post it to my forum <a href="http://bit.ly/4Tnwzn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4Tnwzn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are You Still Using MobileMe? by Charles</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/10/16/why-are-you-still-using-mobileme/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.net/?p=64#comment-22</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I did forget Back to My Mac. If you aren&#039;t technically inclined, or don&#039;t feel like setting up this functionality on your own, this might be pretty helpful. I think I forgot about this feature because I don&#039;t really use it. I use screen sharing and file sharing at home, but I also run an Ubuntu server that I keep anything I might need access to while I&#039;m out and about. 

If you are not pretty technically inclined though, back to my mac should definitely be in the &#039;pro&#039; column. I&#039;ll update the article, thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I did forget Back to My Mac. If you aren&#8217;t technically inclined, or don&#8217;t feel like setting up this functionality on your own, this might be pretty helpful. I think I forgot about this feature because I don&#8217;t really use it. I use screen sharing and file sharing at home, but I also run an Ubuntu server that I keep anything I might need access to while I&#8217;m out and about. </p>
<p>If you are not pretty technically inclined though, back to my mac should definitely be in the &#8216;pro&#8217; column. I&#8217;ll update the article, thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are You Still Using MobileMe? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/10/16/why-are-you-still-using-mobileme/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.net/?p=64#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget &quot;Back to My Mac!&quot; I don&#039;t know why so many people forget to mention this -- perhaps they don&#039;t use it, but it&#039;s far easier than setting up a VPN or firewall rules on a static IP, and it works from multiple subnets, e.g. my computer at work, my computer at home, my computer on the road, all logged into the same MobileMe account can see each other like they&#039;re on the local subnet. It&#039;s almost as useful as the push groupware features themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget &#8220;Back to My Mac!&#8221; I don&#8217;t know why so many people forget to mention this &#8212; perhaps they don&#8217;t use it, but it&#8217;s far easier than setting up a VPN or firewall rules on a static IP, and it works from multiple subnets, e.g. my computer at work, my computer at home, my computer on the road, all logged into the same MobileMe account can see each other like they&#8217;re on the local subnet. It&#8217;s almost as useful as the push groupware features themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS &#8211; Impacts and Expectations by Charles</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-impacts-and-expectations/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.net/?p=33#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Well, as browsers go, I actually really like Chrome. I sort of switched to using Chrome full time on my Windows machine for a while and was pretty happy with the performance.

As for the OS, I&#039;m excited for how good it could be on netbooks, but am waiting to see a reason you&#039;d want to replace another OS on a real machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as browsers go, I actually really like Chrome. I sort of switched to using Chrome full time on my Windows machine for a while and was pretty happy with the performance.</p>
<p>As for the OS, I&#8217;m excited for how good it could be on netbooks, but am waiting to see a reason you&#8217;d want to replace another OS on a real machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS &#8211; Impacts and Expectations by D Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-impacts-and-expectations/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>D Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.net/?p=33#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I could see myself buying a NetBook based on the Chrome OS when it comes out.  But I downloaded the Chrome browser yesterday, and was less than impressed.  When I clicked on a link in an email, Chrome popped up but failed to load the site.  So then I tried pasting in the address, and still no luck.  Finally, I typed &quot;www.google.com/chrome&quot; into Chrome and hit &#039;enter,&#039; and still nothing.

I&#039;m sorry, but that&#039;s not the kind of performance I&#039;m looking for in a browser.  I like apps that are simple and straightforward. I&#039;ll play around some more with Chrome, but based on my initial reaction I would have to say that in all likelihood I&#039;ll be sticking with my Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see myself buying a NetBook based on the Chrome OS when it comes out.  But I downloaded the Chrome browser yesterday, and was less than impressed.  When I clicked on a link in an email, Chrome popped up but failed to load the site.  So then I tried pasting in the address, and still no luck.  Finally, I typed &#8220;www.google.com/chrome&#8221; into Chrome and hit &#8216;enter,&#8217; and still nothing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s not the kind of performance I&#8217;m looking for in a browser.  I like apps that are simple and straightforward. I&#8217;ll play around some more with Chrome, but based on my initial reaction I would have to say that in all likelihood I&#8217;ll be sticking with my Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS &#8211; Impacts and Expectations by James</title>
		<link>http://charlesesmith.net/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-impacts-and-expectations/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesesmith.net/?p=33#comment-3</guid>
		<description>should be interesting to say the least.  Google is always trying to one up Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be interesting to say the least.  Google is always trying to one up Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
